sanjay02
02-13 01:40 AM
Try the FOIA Freedom of Information
wallpaper Jessica Alba Attends quot;Awakequot;
bsnf
10-04 09:09 PM
We went there today, got done in 15 mins. Lots of parking space outside the office.
ChainReaction
03-06 01:58 PM
March 6, 2006
Dear XXXXX:
Thank you for contacting me in support of recapturing unused
employment-based immigrant visas and imposing fees for
immigration services for intracompany transferees. I apologize for
the delay in my reply, but I appreciate hearing from you and I
welcome the opportunity to respond.
I agree that the U.S. government should recapture unused
employment-based immigrant visas and impose immigration service
fees for those visas. As you may know, the United States Senate
version of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, S. 1932, included a
provision that would recapture up to 30,000 H-1B visas that had not
been issued in prior years. Also, S. 1932 would impose an additional
$500 fee to obtain these recaptured visas. These provisions were not
included in the House-passed version of the Deficit Reduction Act of
2005, H.R. 4241. Unfortunately, the Conference Committee, which
was responsible for resolving the differences between the House and
Senate versions of the bill, did not include this provision in the
final
version of S. 1932. The final version of S. 1932 passed in the House
by a vote of 216-214 on February 1, 2006. President Bush signed this
bill into law on February 8, 2006.
Please be assured that I will keep our shared support for
recapturing unused employment-based visas and imposing fees for
immigration services for these visas very much in mind as Congress
considers immigration issues.
Thank you again for contacting me. As your Representative in
the United States Congress, it is a privilege and an honor to serve you
and to act as your voice in Washington. Please feel free to contact me
again with any other issue or matter that concerns you. You may also
want to visit my website at www.house.gov/rothman where you can
sign up for my e-newsletter and keep current with my latest
Congressional activities and policy statements.
Sincerely,
Steven R. Rothman
Member of Congress
Another hopefull congressman to keep in touch with.:)
Dear XXXXX:
Thank you for contacting me in support of recapturing unused
employment-based immigrant visas and imposing fees for
immigration services for intracompany transferees. I apologize for
the delay in my reply, but I appreciate hearing from you and I
welcome the opportunity to respond.
I agree that the U.S. government should recapture unused
employment-based immigrant visas and impose immigration service
fees for those visas. As you may know, the United States Senate
version of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, S. 1932, included a
provision that would recapture up to 30,000 H-1B visas that had not
been issued in prior years. Also, S. 1932 would impose an additional
$500 fee to obtain these recaptured visas. These provisions were not
included in the House-passed version of the Deficit Reduction Act of
2005, H.R. 4241. Unfortunately, the Conference Committee, which
was responsible for resolving the differences between the House and
Senate versions of the bill, did not include this provision in the
final
version of S. 1932. The final version of S. 1932 passed in the House
by a vote of 216-214 on February 1, 2006. President Bush signed this
bill into law on February 8, 2006.
Please be assured that I will keep our shared support for
recapturing unused employment-based visas and imposing fees for
immigration services for these visas very much in mind as Congress
considers immigration issues.
Thank you again for contacting me. As your Representative in
the United States Congress, it is a privilege and an honor to serve you
and to act as your voice in Washington. Please feel free to contact me
again with any other issue or matter that concerns you. You may also
want to visit my website at www.house.gov/rothman where you can
sign up for my e-newsletter and keep current with my latest
Congressional activities and policy statements.
Sincerely,
Steven R. Rothman
Member of Congress
Another hopefull congressman to keep in touch with.:)
2011 Jessica Alba and Terrence
praveenuppaluri
03-11 11:49 AM
unless you have the new cut-off dates for April - they don't want to look at your thread (waste of their precious minute after waiting for many many years ofcourse)
eliminating dependents count for GC is wishful thinking and many pundits talked this issue over and over and yes, it will greatly help elimate backlog but just blogging wont get us anywhere.. people are so anxiously waiting for the April VB that any thread that doesn't give them the new dates are venting their frustations in giving reds.. may be they are the ones who are closer to their finish lines and waiting for the final push to get them greeeen
anyway, with yours in EB3-I mid 2004 and mine in EB2-I just started after 10 yrs in USA, this should help us stay little optimistic. I gave you a green for sharing some hope (however looooong shot it may be). Thanks
Folks,
Please read this. if USCIS takes this seriously then we can expect some movement in coming visa Bulletins
eliminating dependents count for GC is wishful thinking and many pundits talked this issue over and over and yes, it will greatly help elimate backlog but just blogging wont get us anywhere.. people are so anxiously waiting for the April VB that any thread that doesn't give them the new dates are venting their frustations in giving reds.. may be they are the ones who are closer to their finish lines and waiting for the final push to get them greeeen
anyway, with yours in EB3-I mid 2004 and mine in EB2-I just started after 10 yrs in USA, this should help us stay little optimistic. I gave you a green for sharing some hope (however looooong shot it may be). Thanks
Folks,
Please read this. if USCIS takes this seriously then we can expect some movement in coming visa Bulletins
more...
raja_san
05-20 12:00 PM
Thank you all for the reply and the information.
So, I can stay in US with H4 on my wife's H1 Visa and then Apply for fresh H1 after one year. Right?
Thanks.
So, I can stay in US with H4 on my wife's H1 Visa and then Apply for fresh H1 after one year. Right?
Thanks.
suwsku
04-05 05:35 PM
What status are you in now ?
I never entered the US in the first place.
I never entered the US in the first place.
more...
perm2gc
11-30 10:09 PM
Hi,
I am in a fixed situation and in big dilemma.
My H1 is expiring in 2007 June first week.
My current employer's (A) attorney is useless and I had to struggle for a year to get my labor filed.
Labor got approved recently and still struggling to file my I-140 in premium.
Meanwhile, I got an offer for permanent employment in a good organization (B).
I would like take that offer but issues that are bothering me are:
1. If I wait and finish my I-140 with current company (A), do I have to get 3 years H1 extension with Company (A) before transferring to company (B)?
2. Do company (B) have rights to extend my H1 visa for 3 years with I-140 approval from current company (A)?
3. Is it safe to switch companies immediately after I-140 approval? I thought 180 days time is preferred but I don�t have the luxury of waiting for 180 days.
Please help me with these questions.
Thanks!!!
Welcome to immigrationvoice.Please search the forum before posting a new thread..your type of scenario has been discussed and properly addressed by the members.Here is one such thread.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=2417.
If that didnot help you..i request to take some time to search the forum.
I am in a fixed situation and in big dilemma.
My H1 is expiring in 2007 June first week.
My current employer's (A) attorney is useless and I had to struggle for a year to get my labor filed.
Labor got approved recently and still struggling to file my I-140 in premium.
Meanwhile, I got an offer for permanent employment in a good organization (B).
I would like take that offer but issues that are bothering me are:
1. If I wait and finish my I-140 with current company (A), do I have to get 3 years H1 extension with Company (A) before transferring to company (B)?
2. Do company (B) have rights to extend my H1 visa for 3 years with I-140 approval from current company (A)?
3. Is it safe to switch companies immediately after I-140 approval? I thought 180 days time is preferred but I don�t have the luxury of waiting for 180 days.
Please help me with these questions.
Thanks!!!
Welcome to immigrationvoice.Please search the forum before posting a new thread..your type of scenario has been discussed and properly addressed by the members.Here is one such thread.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=2417.
If that didnot help you..i request to take some time to search the forum.
2010 the Jessica Alba thriller
Ann Ruben
03-29 02:36 PM
In some similar cases, filing a petition for mandamus in federal court has been effective. HOWEVER, this strategy is not without risk, and you should consult with an immigration attorney with specific experience dealing with 212(a)(3)(B) "hold" cases before proceeding.
more...
bharani
04-03 09:26 PM
Yes, I got a similar letter last week. I posted about it earlier.
hair Starring: Jessica Alba, Hayden
sroyc
07-09 04:23 PM
I believe that it's the date of last physical entry into the U.S.
I'm in a similar situation and my lawyer filled that.
Dear fellow IV members,
I was just referring to my first application for EAD filed by my lawyer (july filer)
For Q#12 - Date of last entry into the US - my lawyer had entered (05/10/2007) - the H1-B approval date in date of last entry in to US - is this because of the new I-94 attached to H1-B approval notice?
But the I-94 in the passport shows my actual physical entry into US after my last visit outside the country - 08/10/2006.
I have not traveled outside the country after renewing my H1-B.
Which date did you guys put - the actual date of physical entry or the I-94 start date after renewal of H1-B?
Thank you!!!
I'm in a similar situation and my lawyer filled that.
Dear fellow IV members,
I was just referring to my first application for EAD filed by my lawyer (july filer)
For Q#12 - Date of last entry into the US - my lawyer had entered (05/10/2007) - the H1-B approval date in date of last entry in to US - is this because of the new I-94 attached to H1-B approval notice?
But the I-94 in the passport shows my actual physical entry into US after my last visit outside the country - 08/10/2006.
I have not traveled outside the country after renewing my H1-B.
Which date did you guys put - the actual date of physical entry or the I-94 start date after renewal of H1-B?
Thank you!!!
more...
Blog Feeds
09-18 10:20 AM
AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:
There has been a lot of talk recently about what might be included in an immigration reform bill. Will there be a legalization/amnesty/forgiveness of "lawbreakers" rule? Will there be an expansion of employment based and family based immigrant visa numbers to solve the economically devastating backlogs we currently deal with? Will there be a mandatory E-Verify component? Will there be an interior enforcement focus? Will there be even more fences?
The topic that seems to be lost in all this speculation is something I consider to be the overriding component of reform--the Key to holding a reform package together. I am speaking, of course, of Due Process Restoration. Anyone who deals with immigrants for any length of time is intimately familiar with the disaster that is our immigration enforcement system. It is not just that previous administrations have done a horrific job at the enforcement that should have been taking place, but rather, the missing component to that enforcement. When is the last time an ICE officer worried about Due Process considerations? What is really destroying immigrant families--how about 212(a)(9)(B) and (C)? What about the concept of "civil" detention in real jails with real criminals for non-criminal immigrants? What about the detention of Asylum Seekers? What about the ludicrous requirements of REAL ID for asylum seekers?
These are all only a few of the regular violations of concepts most American hold sacred. When you tell the 'average' American about the system immigrants actually have to deal with, most are appropriately appalled. It is to those Americans that we must speak. I believe that if Senator Schumer has the courage to include Due Process Restoration in his "Comprehensive" immigration reform bill, it will be tragically necessary for us to defend these Due Process provisions of the reform package.
Take a look at this video, and sign up to support including Due Process Restoration in a comprehensive immigration reform bill.
Restore Fairness: bring back due process to the immigration system (http://vimeo.com/6200660) from Breakthrough (http://vimeo.com/letsbreakthrough) on Vimeo (http://vimeo.com/).
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-7017328086435157158?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/09/due-process-restoration-now.html)
There has been a lot of talk recently about what might be included in an immigration reform bill. Will there be a legalization/amnesty/forgiveness of "lawbreakers" rule? Will there be an expansion of employment based and family based immigrant visa numbers to solve the economically devastating backlogs we currently deal with? Will there be a mandatory E-Verify component? Will there be an interior enforcement focus? Will there be even more fences?
The topic that seems to be lost in all this speculation is something I consider to be the overriding component of reform--the Key to holding a reform package together. I am speaking, of course, of Due Process Restoration. Anyone who deals with immigrants for any length of time is intimately familiar with the disaster that is our immigration enforcement system. It is not just that previous administrations have done a horrific job at the enforcement that should have been taking place, but rather, the missing component to that enforcement. When is the last time an ICE officer worried about Due Process considerations? What is really destroying immigrant families--how about 212(a)(9)(B) and (C)? What about the concept of "civil" detention in real jails with real criminals for non-criminal immigrants? What about the detention of Asylum Seekers? What about the ludicrous requirements of REAL ID for asylum seekers?
These are all only a few of the regular violations of concepts most American hold sacred. When you tell the 'average' American about the system immigrants actually have to deal with, most are appropriately appalled. It is to those Americans that we must speak. I believe that if Senator Schumer has the courage to include Due Process Restoration in his "Comprehensive" immigration reform bill, it will be tragically necessary for us to defend these Due Process provisions of the reform package.
Take a look at this video, and sign up to support including Due Process Restoration in a comprehensive immigration reform bill.
Restore Fairness: bring back due process to the immigration system (http://vimeo.com/6200660) from Breakthrough (http://vimeo.com/letsbreakthrough) on Vimeo (http://vimeo.com/).
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-7017328086435157158?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/09/due-process-restoration-now.html)
hot JESSICA ALBA WIDE AWAKE IN NYC
GCwaitforever
02-28 10:02 AM
I believe it is a bad thing that the loan from Indian banks does not show up on US credit reports. Also people should disclose what all current loan payments they are making before they can take up a new loan. Otherwise it would be lying.
more...
house Jessica Alba stars as
joolie1
02-08 09:29 AM
I DO have a Permanent Resident Card, which expires 08/27/11 but they also issued me an Employment Authorization Card. From reading your question, I wonder if the EAC was only issued to get me through the period of time during which my application was being processed. If that's the case, I would be VERY much relieved!
tattoo Awake (2007) (Jessica Alba)
garybanz
03-27 03:18 PM
Can anybody tell the stages in I 485 approval.
Backround check
previous status in this country
Medical
what else they check during this stage?
Following are the stages
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You get it :)
Backround check
previous status in this country
Medical
what else they check during this stage?
Following are the stages
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You wait
You get it :)
more...
pictures Jessica Alba Short
prem_goel
11-18 06:11 PM
ha ha ha....well said...
ofcourse they have been wasting watching stupid games in TVs / Stadiums instead could use 'that' time to gain some new skills / learn new technologies that are required to survive in the job market
First of all, is your profile legitimate? It shows your PD as Dec'07 / EB3/India and you are in 485 processing??????
anyway, as long as some fools doesn't admit the facts and realize the changing world, all those forums / blogs / hatred etc; will be just a waste of their time. ofcourse they have been wasting watching stupid games in TVs / Stadiums instead could use 'that' time to gain some new skills / learn new technologies that are required to survive in the job market.
ofcourse they have been wasting watching stupid games in TVs / Stadiums instead could use 'that' time to gain some new skills / learn new technologies that are required to survive in the job market
First of all, is your profile legitimate? It shows your PD as Dec'07 / EB3/India and you are in 485 processing??????
anyway, as long as some fools doesn't admit the facts and realize the changing world, all those forums / blogs / hatred etc; will be just a waste of their time. ofcourse they have been wasting watching stupid games in TVs / Stadiums instead could use 'that' time to gain some new skills / learn new technologies that are required to survive in the job market.
dresses Jessica Alba,
mrdelhiite
07-12 08:17 AM
This USCIS fisco seeps have more twists than Anna Nicole Smith case.
here you another angle to it:
http://www.immigration-law.com/
07/12/2007: Truth to Rumor of Resrictionist Senators Having Influenced USCIS Decision of July 2007 EB New Filing
There is an unconfirmed source of information that a couple of restrictionist U.S. Senators influenced the USCIS decision to reject July applications for their alleged fear that since July 2007 Visa Bulletin would open a flood gate of hundreds of thousands of 485 applications, the public might take it as the government giving out a sort of "amnesty" to these floods of people. We hope that there is no truth to such rumor. However, if it is true, it is indeed shocking that individual legislators could interfere with the government process on "personal" basis and without the formal legislative process of public notice and participation. We urge the U.S. Senate to get to the bottom of this rumor and take appropriate action for correction under the Senate rules.
Repost. Please close this thread.
Thanks
-M
here you another angle to it:
http://www.immigration-law.com/
07/12/2007: Truth to Rumor of Resrictionist Senators Having Influenced USCIS Decision of July 2007 EB New Filing
There is an unconfirmed source of information that a couple of restrictionist U.S. Senators influenced the USCIS decision to reject July applications for their alleged fear that since July 2007 Visa Bulletin would open a flood gate of hundreds of thousands of 485 applications, the public might take it as the government giving out a sort of "amnesty" to these floods of people. We hope that there is no truth to such rumor. However, if it is true, it is indeed shocking that individual legislators could interfere with the government process on "personal" basis and without the formal legislative process of public notice and participation. We urge the U.S. Senate to get to the bottom of this rumor and take appropriate action for correction under the Senate rules.
Repost. Please close this thread.
Thanks
-M
more...
makeup Jessica Alba, and Terrence
snathan
04-08 08:41 AM
I am a resident working on H1b. Got married and wife joined me in July 2010.
1. First question in the ITIN form w-7 is: Reason you are submitting Form W-7. (there are couple of options)
Is the option in my case: "Spouse of U.S. citizen/resident alien"? (and it asks for the resident's i.e. my name and SSN.)
What are the other options
2. Item 6d. "Identification documents submitted" ?
Options are for passport, Divers License, USCIS documentation.
My wife has all the three. Her H4 visa is stamped and valid. What all should I submit?
Notorized copy of the passport which shows the valid visa...
Thx
.
1. First question in the ITIN form w-7 is: Reason you are submitting Form W-7. (there are couple of options)
Is the option in my case: "Spouse of U.S. citizen/resident alien"? (and it asks for the resident's i.e. my name and SSN.)
What are the other options
2. Item 6d. "Identification documents submitted" ?
Options are for passport, Divers License, USCIS documentation.
My wife has all the three. Her H4 visa is stamped and valid. What all should I submit?
Notorized copy of the passport which shows the valid visa...
Thx
.
girlfriend Jessica-Alba-Awake-01
ZeroComplexity
03-13 03:11 PM
IV members should take the moral high ground refrain from making frivolous calls to USCIS, so that genuine issues get addressed quickly by USCIS.
You don't want to be holding up the lines over a LUD when someone is waiting for a USCIS customer rep over a denied I-485.
You don't want to be holding up the lines over a LUD when someone is waiting for a USCIS customer rep over a denied I-485.
hairstyles Awake Video Jessica Alba
chanduv23
04-26 09:52 PM
Hi guys,
Some of may think "Wait for the actual letter to come" but I feel too nervous and just want to share my thoughts. I applied for EB5 and my I526 was approved. Then I applied adjustment of status and got an I485 RFE. Have not got the letter yet but got the email that my case is on hold right now. Can you tell me about the RFE? Is that common? Is that the first step of denial? I'm so nervous right now. I will write what they are asking when I got the letter which I'm expecting on Tuesday or Wednesday. Thank you very much.
These days people are figiting wrong ful denials through MTRs. RFEs are common and one does not have to worry about RFE. Just wait for your letter and respond accordingly. There is no "first step" for denial - if your case is approvable it gets approved - if not it gets denied - period.
Some of may think "Wait for the actual letter to come" but I feel too nervous and just want to share my thoughts. I applied for EB5 and my I526 was approved. Then I applied adjustment of status and got an I485 RFE. Have not got the letter yet but got the email that my case is on hold right now. Can you tell me about the RFE? Is that common? Is that the first step of denial? I'm so nervous right now. I will write what they are asking when I got the letter which I'm expecting on Tuesday or Wednesday. Thank you very much.
These days people are figiting wrong ful denials through MTRs. RFEs are common and one does not have to worry about RFE. Just wait for your letter and respond accordingly. There is no "first step" for denial - if your case is approvable it gets approved - if not it gets denied - period.
oljinx
05-10 03:03 PM
Mine said
Bachelor or equivalent with computer related coursework for which I submitted equivalency.
Bachelor or equivalent with computer related coursework for which I submitted equivalency.
dehradoon
10-09 04:25 PM
Hi,
I recently received EAD and my I-140 approved an year ago . I am waiting for the 180 days count down to be over. but my question here is after 180 days if i want to use AC21 , do we really need to have the I-140 apporval copy or receipt number bcz it is still with my employer and they are not going to share with the me for sure. But it got approved and year ago for me.
Also is there any way i can get the receipt number of I140 by calling the USCIS ?
Please help!
Thanks
It is not required, only the application number for the 140 would do and the print out of the page from the uscis website saying "approval notice sent"
I recently received EAD and my I-140 approved an year ago . I am waiting for the 180 days count down to be over. but my question here is after 180 days if i want to use AC21 , do we really need to have the I-140 apporval copy or receipt number bcz it is still with my employer and they are not going to share with the me for sure. But it got approved and year ago for me.
Also is there any way i can get the receipt number of I140 by calling the USCIS ?
Please help!
Thanks
It is not required, only the application number for the 140 would do and the print out of the page from the uscis website saying "approval notice sent"
