gc_chahiye
09-19 11:16 PM
Are both of these I-140s on the same labor cert?
Whats the RFE about?
What does your lawyer say? Ignoring the RFE does not seem right, at minimum you should contact USCIS and explain the situation to them.
Whats the RFE about?
What does your lawyer say? Ignoring the RFE does not seem right, at minimum you should contact USCIS and explain the situation to them.
wallpaper perfume bottle instead of
thomachan72
11-26 12:49 AM
what is the reason for the denial? Only after knowing that you can determine whether you could apeal or not. Let us know what the denial reason is.
bhartigorkar
07-25 01:32 PM
Hi Halfdog
I think the intent of the original work (http://vector.tutsplus.com/articles/theory/six-things-i-think-about-when-im-mutating-a-rabbit/) is to educate\inspire others. It is a tutorial. I followed the process the author explains and came up with the idea. I felt is could be better used for T-shirt.
It is a new expression of the underlying idea of the original work, rather than a copying of the work itself.
This is by no means plagiarism as you are accusing.
If the moderators feel that it is the case then it is ok to remove my entry from the competition.
My own illustration
http://a.imageshack.us/img411/1563/charactersr.jpg
Thanks
bharti
I think the intent of the original work (http://vector.tutsplus.com/articles/theory/six-things-i-think-about-when-im-mutating-a-rabbit/) is to educate\inspire others. It is a tutorial. I followed the process the author explains and came up with the idea. I felt is could be better used for T-shirt.
It is a new expression of the underlying idea of the original work, rather than a copying of the work itself.
This is by no means plagiarism as you are accusing.
If the moderators feel that it is the case then it is ok to remove my entry from the competition.
My own illustration
http://a.imageshack.us/img411/1563/charactersr.jpg
Thanks
bharti
2011 Ri-Ri#39;s perfume is on the way
kanshul
01-26 03:04 PM
I agree with all the above.
Also, since you wokred on EAD, you are no longer in H1B status. You will be OK - but it is better to ask the H1B petitioner to withdraw the H1B application to avoid any future complications.
Also, since you wokred on EAD, you are no longer in H1B status. You will be OK - but it is better to ask the H1B petitioner to withdraw the H1B application to avoid any future complications.
more...
GCSeeker2006
05-28 03:37 PM
It's only you who will receive the card, not lawyer.
frostrated
12-01 04:25 PM
you cannot file two 485s. what you can do is get till the 140 stage, and then port the old 485 to your 140.
more...
kishorek111
06-28 02:16 PM
do you really need to worry about this? Here are your options...
1. Let your children keep Indian citizenship... Don't report about your Canadian citizenship to Indian authorities... Travel separately to India.. Don't take your kids with you... might be call your parents and ask them to take your kids... I don't think it would be a problem while coming back....and I don't think Indian authorities will find it....
2. Get Canadian citizenship for your kids and take OCI card... They can always get back their Indian citizenship later
1. Let your children keep Indian citizenship... Don't report about your Canadian citizenship to Indian authorities... Travel separately to India.. Don't take your kids with you... might be call your parents and ask them to take your kids... I don't think it would be a problem while coming back....and I don't think Indian authorities will find it....
2. Get Canadian citizenship for your kids and take OCI card... They can always get back their Indian citizenship later
2010 Jennifer Aniston peddles
tillu
04-02 02:27 AM
Can someone help??
Where are the guys who can reply this.
Please reply before it is too late for me.
Where are the guys who can reply this.
Please reply before it is too late for me.
more...
Pineapple
05-07 09:05 AM
I believe the correct Kafka analogy should be "The Trial", not "The Metamorphosis".
The Trial is about a character, Josef K. who is arrested one day, out of the blue, for an unspecified crime. The novel is about K.'s futile attempts to figure out why on earth he is being prosecuted.
The Trial is about a character, Josef K. who is arrested one day, out of the blue, for an unspecified crime. The novel is about K.'s futile attempts to figure out why on earth he is being prosecuted.
hair Beauty News - Jennifer
immmj
01-11 02:28 PM
Apply H4 with lawyer or by ourselves? My lawyer took care of my H1B, green card cases. Do I need to apply H4 for my wife through my lawyer? What is the advantage of using lawyer with H4 application. Can I apply it by myself? Is there any H4 application checklist around? Thank you.
more...
txh1b
08-18 09:53 AM
Agree with wandmaker.
hot Jennifer Aniston#39;s NYC Perfume
sparklinks
09-16 02:53 PM
My wife is working on EAD and her EAD is expiring begining of next month. New EAD has been applied. Can she work with the EAD renewal receipt if the EAD expires ? What are the possible options ? Pleas help
We applied on June 15th (TSC) still waiting...currect EAD exp. next week :(
We applied on June 15th (TSC) still waiting...currect EAD exp. next week :(
more...
house Featuring John Aniston, Constantine Maroulis, Mary Ryland, Gloria Gaynor,
zephyrr
05-22 12:20 AM
i thought i would share that my 140+485 which was concurrently filed on 2nd jul got approved today. seems like the ead renewal trigerred it as i see a LUD on that as well.
looks like 2003 pd are starting to get picked up at TSC.
how long does it take to get the actual card? i have to travel outside the country next month, what do i need to get back?
thanks.
looks like 2003 pd are starting to get picked up at TSC.
how long does it take to get the actual card? i have to travel outside the country next month, what do i need to get back?
thanks.
tattoo It#39;s her debut perfume
xZeRo23
06-21 06:54 PM
What is that animal?! O.o
more...
pictures girlfriend Jennifer Aniston
ns33
03-18 04:36 PM
Hello,
Assuming a 40 hr/week position, a person works 2080 hours per year. The Annual Salary for a $46/hr position is $95680/year.
Also, if you only have annual salary for the new position, you could convert to hourly by dividing by 2080.
But I wouldn't even worry about all this. Just send in the annual salary figure (just for your own satisfaction make sure it is more than $46 per hour) and USCIS will figure out the rest.
Hope that helps.
Actually if you factor in 10-12 holidays and about 20 VC days it will come to roughly 1824 hours a year or roughly 152hr/month avg.
Assuming a 40 hr/week position, a person works 2080 hours per year. The Annual Salary for a $46/hr position is $95680/year.
Also, if you only have annual salary for the new position, you could convert to hourly by dividing by 2080.
But I wouldn't even worry about all this. Just send in the annual salary figure (just for your own satisfaction make sure it is more than $46 per hour) and USCIS will figure out the rest.
Hope that helps.
Actually if you factor in 10-12 holidays and about 20 VC days it will come to roughly 1824 hours a year or roughly 152hr/month avg.
dresses jennifer aniston new hair
aim-high
03-24 04:32 PM
I am planning to apply for Schengen visa in an Italian consulate. I have an expired H1 but a valid AP. According to the italian consulate website, here is one of the visa requirements
"passport or travel document valid for at least three months after visa expiry date"
My passport is expiring in 2 years but my AP will be expiring in about 2 1/2 months from the Schengen visa expiry. Will I have an issue getting a visa ?
Do I have a workaround ?
Thanks
"passport or travel document valid for at least three months after visa expiry date"
My passport is expiring in 2 years but my AP will be expiring in about 2 1/2 months from the Schengen visa expiry. Will I have an issue getting a visa ?
Do I have a workaround ?
Thanks
more...
makeup Jennifer Aniston Lolavie
http404
07-17 10:32 PM
I got myself in somewhat of a mess here and wondering if there is any solution?
I filed for my I-485 on June 28th and it reached UCSIS on 2nd July. I wasn't able to do the same for my wife as she was in India at that time.
She is back now and I want to file her I-485 but my lawyer tells me I can not do that because it either needs to be filed concurrently with mine or they need to have a receipt for my I-485 which doesn't seem to be coming in the next few weeks.
Is there anything else I can do? Anyone has similar experiences? Will a copy of my I-485 filing do?
Thanks.
I filed for my I-485 on June 28th and it reached UCSIS on 2nd July. I wasn't able to do the same for my wife as she was in India at that time.
She is back now and I want to file her I-485 but my lawyer tells me I can not do that because it either needs to be filed concurrently with mine or they need to have a receipt for my I-485 which doesn't seem to be coming in the next few weeks.
Is there anything else I can do? Anyone has similar experiences? Will a copy of my I-485 filing do?
Thanks.
girlfriend Jennifer Aniston Takes Off Her
Desertfox
07-28 03:44 PM
Probably the last action rule triggers in your case from Oct'08 and you will not be considered in L-1 status anymore. You should talk to an attorney I guess.
hairstyles jennifer aniston new hairstyle
GCLONGWAIT
09-16 04:53 PM
Would appreciate guidance from attorneys and anybody gone through such an experience or having knowledge about it. Below is my scenerio:
My I-140 in EB-3 was denied and was appealed. As a response for my appeal, I received a notice of Derogatory Information and RFE.
After receiving this notice, we realized that company's old lawyer unintentionally clicked a wrong answer in the labor application that was filed and approved in 2006. There is the clause on Page one of ETA form 9089, Part C, point # 9, where we have statement if there is any familial relationship of the alien with the owners / partners of the sponsoring company. This was done by the old lawyer and he is no more working for the company.
In the notice, the appeal officer has mentioned "if a familial relationship exists between the beneficiary and the petitioner's owners / partners , and this was not disclosed to the DOL, USCIS may invalidate the labor certification based on this misrepresentation. You are therefore, requested to explain what familial relationship, if any, exists between the beneficiary and the officers of the company."
The above mistake was done intentionally as the company's present lawyer did mention about the familial ties of the beneficiary with the partner of the company in the H-1 application that was approved in 2009 and in the new labor application EB-2 category that was filed in 2009 and still pending. Also, a separate letter regarding the same was sent to the labor department this year along with the other supporting documents as a answer to audit.
Looking at the above scenario, can you all please let me know:
Is there a possibility to explain the appeal Officer that it was an unintentional mistake as it was not meant to hide as in 2009 , that is a year before this notice was sent out, labor department was given the right answer in another labor application and USCIS did approve the H-1 even after they knew that the familial ties did exist.?
OR
Am are they surely going to revoke my old labor?
Any help or guidance would be highly appreciated and anybody gone though the same can please let know their experience.
Thanx in Advance
My I-140 in EB-3 was denied and was appealed. As a response for my appeal, I received a notice of Derogatory Information and RFE.
After receiving this notice, we realized that company's old lawyer unintentionally clicked a wrong answer in the labor application that was filed and approved in 2006. There is the clause on Page one of ETA form 9089, Part C, point # 9, where we have statement if there is any familial relationship of the alien with the owners / partners of the sponsoring company. This was done by the old lawyer and he is no more working for the company.
In the notice, the appeal officer has mentioned "if a familial relationship exists between the beneficiary and the petitioner's owners / partners , and this was not disclosed to the DOL, USCIS may invalidate the labor certification based on this misrepresentation. You are therefore, requested to explain what familial relationship, if any, exists between the beneficiary and the officers of the company."
The above mistake was done intentionally as the company's present lawyer did mention about the familial ties of the beneficiary with the partner of the company in the H-1 application that was approved in 2009 and in the new labor application EB-2 category that was filed in 2009 and still pending. Also, a separate letter regarding the same was sent to the labor department this year along with the other supporting documents as a answer to audit.
Looking at the above scenario, can you all please let me know:
Is there a possibility to explain the appeal Officer that it was an unintentional mistake as it was not meant to hide as in 2009 , that is a year before this notice was sent out, labor department was given the right answer in another labor application and USCIS did approve the H-1 even after they knew that the familial ties did exist.?
OR
Am are they surely going to revoke my old labor?
Any help or guidance would be highly appreciated and anybody gone though the same can please let know their experience.
Thanx in Advance
immi2006
01-05 10:16 AM
Do u want to push this idea ?
dog123
01-11 04:41 PM
/\/\/\/\
