raysaikat
01-14 12:01 AM
Hi ,
I'm looking for university professor/asst professor/lecturer job whereby university can sponsor h1b.If anybody can point me to universities which sponsor h1b in/near bay area ,it would be great. the local community colleges does not seem to sponsor h1b.
Thanks a lot,
Tarun
Faculty positions that require a minimum qualification of Ph.D. would sponsor H1-B.
I am curious; what is your qualification? Folks who have a serious shot at a faculty position normally do not bother about asking questions about H1-B; that's the least of the hurdles of getting a faculty position.
I'm looking for university professor/asst professor/lecturer job whereby university can sponsor h1b.If anybody can point me to universities which sponsor h1b in/near bay area ,it would be great. the local community colleges does not seem to sponsor h1b.
Thanks a lot,
Tarun
Faculty positions that require a minimum qualification of Ph.D. would sponsor H1-B.
I am curious; what is your qualification? Folks who have a serious shot at a faculty position normally do not bother about asking questions about H1-B; that's the least of the hurdles of getting a faculty position.
wallpaper Stronger With Each Tear is set
psaxena
06-03 05:57 PM
should I get a white cat or black cat
I want to avoid me being racist on cats.
No wait, it can be better..
My friend wants to buy a cat which one should he get black or white.
any ideas about 1-2day /night cruise from Houston/Galveston ? I want to avoid Immigration checks.
Thanks in advance.
I want to avoid me being racist on cats.
No wait, it can be better..
My friend wants to buy a cat which one should he get black or white.
any ideas about 1-2day /night cruise from Houston/Galveston ? I want to avoid Immigration checks.
Thanks in advance.
justice4all
02-04 11:23 AM
Thanks validIV for your reply.. I spoke to couple of attorneys regarding that.. one said its illegal and dont want to talk about it, other said that's the only option for my wife to go to job since she doesn't have an EAD.
Lawyers reading this thread can throw some light..
thanks
Lawyers reading this thread can throw some light..
thanks
2011 stronger with each tear
simple1
09-17 01:25 PM
The following attracted me.
- only toefl required. no gre/gmat required.
- low fees (with sponsored tuition option)
- detc accretion (legal, not a diploma mill)
- no residency required.
Other than that it is not a famous university. I believe it is not in any ranking what so ever.
more details.
http://www.aju.edu/Admissions/catalog.pdf
They offer specialization on sales, strategy, finance, hr, health services and marketing.
I am just thinking about applying. Not decided yet.
This is interesting. Do you know more about the program ?
The website has very little info. They want $75 fee to get started.
Is there info on who offers the degree, how many courses need to be taken, how long does it take etc ?
- only toefl required. no gre/gmat required.
- low fees (with sponsored tuition option)
- detc accretion (legal, not a diploma mill)
- no residency required.
Other than that it is not a famous university. I believe it is not in any ranking what so ever.
more details.
http://www.aju.edu/Admissions/catalog.pdf
They offer specialization on sales, strategy, finance, hr, health services and marketing.
I am just thinking about applying. Not decided yet.
This is interesting. Do you know more about the program ?
The website has very little info. They want $75 fee to get started.
Is there info on who offers the degree, how many courses need to be taken, how long does it take etc ?
more...
Blog Feeds
07-13 12:48 PM
USCIS has recently published a new fact sheet of common questions and answers for members of the U.S. Armed Forces and their families. (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/Immigration%20Information%20for%20Members%20of%20t he%20U.S.%20Armed%20Forces%20and%20their%20Familie s.pdf) The fact sheet contains the most frequently asked questions that USCIS receives.
The fact sheet is worth reading if you are in the Armed Forces because the answers to some of the questions are different (and usually more advantageous) to members and/or dependents of those in the Armed Forces. For instance, if you are a civilian, obtained your green card through a marriage to a U.S. Citizen and you have been married for less than two years, you must file Form I-751, Petition to Remove Conditions on Residence (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=f858d59cb7a5d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1RCR D&vgnextchannel=db029c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD) to remove the conditional residence and obtain your permanent green card. You must file this form even if you intend on applying for citizenship a year later. (Persons who are married to U.S. citizens may apply for citizenship in three years.)
Members of the armed forces do not have to file Form I-751, Petition to Remove Conditions on Residence to remove conditional residence obtained through a marriage to a U.S. Citizen, if the foreign born spouse was inducted or enlisted in the military and is applying for naturalization based on qualifying military service. Thus, military personnel are permitted to "skip a step" and do not need to file form I-751.
Additional questions and answers and helpful email addresses to USCIS liaisons are included on the fact sheet.
http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/father%20and%20son.jpg
More... (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/2009/07/immigration_information_for_me_1.html)
The fact sheet is worth reading if you are in the Armed Forces because the answers to some of the questions are different (and usually more advantageous) to members and/or dependents of those in the Armed Forces. For instance, if you are a civilian, obtained your green card through a marriage to a U.S. Citizen and you have been married for less than two years, you must file Form I-751, Petition to Remove Conditions on Residence (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=f858d59cb7a5d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1RCR D&vgnextchannel=db029c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD) to remove the conditional residence and obtain your permanent green card. You must file this form even if you intend on applying for citizenship a year later. (Persons who are married to U.S. citizens may apply for citizenship in three years.)
Members of the armed forces do not have to file Form I-751, Petition to Remove Conditions on Residence to remove conditional residence obtained through a marriage to a U.S. Citizen, if the foreign born spouse was inducted or enlisted in the military and is applying for naturalization based on qualifying military service. Thus, military personnel are permitted to "skip a step" and do not need to file form I-751.
Additional questions and answers and helpful email addresses to USCIS liaisons are included on the fact sheet.
http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/father%20and%20son.jpg
More... (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/2009/07/immigration_information_for_me_1.html)
Ectheo
05-09 10:27 PM
Alright, I changed the font. It's kinda hard to find a nice calligraphy style font for numbers. If anyone knows of a good one, lemme know, cuz I couldn't find one.
http://www.ectheo.com/stamp-2.jpg
http://www.ectheo.com/stamp-2.jpg
more...
smuggymba
12-18 08:31 AM
Cap on skilled immigration unlawful: UK court - World News - IBNLive (http://ibnlive.in.com/news/cap-on-skilled-immigration-unlawful-uk-court/137822-2.html?from=tn)
London: A temporary cap on the number of skilled workers from India and other countries outside the European Union was introduced in June 'unlawfully', the High Court ruled on Friday.
Home Secretary Theresa May had introduced the cap as an interim measure before a permanent cap to be in place from April 2011. It was challenged on the ground that ministers had 'sidestepped' parliamentary scrutiny before announcing the
temporary cap.
The legal challenge to the cap of 24,100 until April 2011 was brought by the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants (JCWI) and English Community Care Association, and was upheld by judges on Friday.
The Home Office said this did not imperil its flagship immigration policy but the opposition Labour said the police it was in "chaos" after the court ruling.
The ruling has nullified the current temporary cap, meaning it is no longer in force.
The cap was one of the first measures of the coalition government that promised to bring down immigrations from hundreds of thousands every year to 'tens of thousands.
In today's ruling, Lord Justice Sullivan and Justice Burton concluded that the home secretary had not gone through the proper parliamentary procedures before implementing the cap, which took effect without a vote in Parliament.
The judges said: "The secretary of state made no secret of her intentions. There can be no doubt that she was attempting to side-step provisions for Parliamentary scrutiny set up under provisions of the 1971 Immigration Act and her attempt was for that reason unlawful." As a result, it said no lawful limits were now in place for Tier One and Tier Two applicants from abroad. The Home Office said it was still "firmly committed" to reducing levels of net migration. "I am disappointed with today's verdict," Immigration minister Damian Green said, adding: "We will do all in our power to continue to prevent a rush of applications before our more permanent measures are in place".
London: A temporary cap on the number of skilled workers from India and other countries outside the European Union was introduced in June 'unlawfully', the High Court ruled on Friday.
Home Secretary Theresa May had introduced the cap as an interim measure before a permanent cap to be in place from April 2011. It was challenged on the ground that ministers had 'sidestepped' parliamentary scrutiny before announcing the
temporary cap.
The legal challenge to the cap of 24,100 until April 2011 was brought by the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants (JCWI) and English Community Care Association, and was upheld by judges on Friday.
The Home Office said this did not imperil its flagship immigration policy but the opposition Labour said the police it was in "chaos" after the court ruling.
The ruling has nullified the current temporary cap, meaning it is no longer in force.
The cap was one of the first measures of the coalition government that promised to bring down immigrations from hundreds of thousands every year to 'tens of thousands.
In today's ruling, Lord Justice Sullivan and Justice Burton concluded that the home secretary had not gone through the proper parliamentary procedures before implementing the cap, which took effect without a vote in Parliament.
The judges said: "The secretary of state made no secret of her intentions. There can be no doubt that she was attempting to side-step provisions for Parliamentary scrutiny set up under provisions of the 1971 Immigration Act and her attempt was for that reason unlawful." As a result, it said no lawful limits were now in place for Tier One and Tier Two applicants from abroad. The Home Office said it was still "firmly committed" to reducing levels of net migration. "I am disappointed with today's verdict," Immigration minister Damian Green said, adding: "We will do all in our power to continue to prevent a rush of applications before our more permanent measures are in place".
2010 Mary J. Blige
GCwaitforever
06-09 05:28 PM
We are neither immigration lawyers nor USCIS officials. They are the only ones competant answer to such questions. Anyways, the bill mentions nothing about having "experience" in your field .. what is required is to be working in the US for the 3 years preceeding your I-485. Everything else is immaterial.
But now is not the time to be dreaming and counting unhatched chickens IMO.
It should be before the immigrant petition is filed. So before I-140 is applied.
But now is not the time to be dreaming and counting unhatched chickens IMO.
It should be before the immigrant petition is filed. So before I-140 is applied.
more...
djmaddy
03-24 10:03 PM
Nice pencils! Is this graphite?!
hair Stronger With Each Tear
LostInGCProcess
11-12 12:21 PM
Your new company must sponsor your H1 before the old company send the request to cancel your H1.
Once revoked, you have probably couple of weeks to pack up. So, its best you get started on the new H1 before the old H1 is revoked.
Once revoked, you have probably couple of weeks to pack up. So, its best you get started on the new H1 before the old H1 is revoked.
more...
gc_bulgaria
10-23 07:42 PM
I haven't had a LUD since September - non after FP too!
Received AP today - status online still says pending.:p
Received AP today - status online still says pending.:p
hot Stronger-With-Each-Tear-mary-j
greenmonster
11-19 08:31 AM
Got my NC Driv License after 6 weeks. Issued based on EAD.
more...
house quot;Stronger With Each Tearquot;
krishna_brc
07-02 05:43 PM
Tnks for the quick response. a couple more questions :D
1) Eligibility Status?
2)Please provide information concerning your eligibility status.
Do I need to put anything in there? Or I can just leave it blank?
I entered C (9) - Pending AOS as Eligibility Status.
1) Eligibility Status?
2)Please provide information concerning your eligibility status.
Do I need to put anything in there? Or I can just leave it blank?
I entered C (9) - Pending AOS as Eligibility Status.
tattoo Stronger With Each Tear
desi3933
03-18 09:06 AM
What are the rules for getting a new 3 X 2 year H1.
Person leaves US while on the 5th year in November 07.
applies for H1b in april 08 and gets new H1b valid from Oct 08 to March 09.
However re-enters US only after 365 days of external stay in december 08 (not in Oct 08).
Is he eligible for a new 3X2 year H1 or can he obtain only a year extension to recapture the time spent abroad (365 days)?
You can get -
1. a year extension to recapture the time spent abroad
2. New/Extend H-1B for 3 year, but will be subject to cap
3. can get new/extension H-1B for 3 years without cap, if you have I-140 approved
4. can get new/extension H-1B for 1 year without cap, if I-140 is pending
___________________
Not a legal advice.
Person leaves US while on the 5th year in November 07.
applies for H1b in april 08 and gets new H1b valid from Oct 08 to March 09.
However re-enters US only after 365 days of external stay in december 08 (not in Oct 08).
Is he eligible for a new 3X2 year H1 or can he obtain only a year extension to recapture the time spent abroad (365 days)?
You can get -
1. a year extension to recapture the time spent abroad
2. New/Extend H-1B for 3 year, but will be subject to cap
3. can get new/extension H-1B for 3 years without cap, if you have I-140 approved
4. can get new/extension H-1B for 1 year without cap, if I-140 is pending
___________________
Not a legal advice.
more...
pictures stronger with each tear.
waitin_toolong
09-21 03:39 PM
I’m confused about using the EAD. Someone please clarify me….
I already received the EAD for me and my wife. Currently, I’m in the H1b which is expiring on Sep 2008 (6 years are over). My questions are?
•Can I be in H1b and still work another job as a part-time?
------ if the part time job is using a part time H1 only then you will be H1 and dependents in H4 using EAD meaning you lose H1/4
•If my wife wants to work using her EAD does it have any effect on her h4 status?
--- her status becomes AOS pending and H4 is gone
•If my wife loose her job during the use of her EAD what will be her status?
--- she will reamain AOS pending same as while using EAD
•I applied my I485 in July 2, 2007. As I already received my EAD, can I be unemployed after 180 days and start a business by myself?
---- you can be self-employed and have similar job description and LC
•I know after receiving the AP I visit any their country. What will be my status after I come back? Still H1b or anything else?
----- if you enter using H1 then it will be H1. the debate is still on whether using AP to enter causes you to lose H1 or not. It is possible to extend H1 status though.
It will be very much appreciated if some can answer my questions?
Thanks ahead\
I already received the EAD for me and my wife. Currently, I’m in the H1b which is expiring on Sep 2008 (6 years are over). My questions are?
•Can I be in H1b and still work another job as a part-time?
------ if the part time job is using a part time H1 only then you will be H1 and dependents in H4 using EAD meaning you lose H1/4
•If my wife wants to work using her EAD does it have any effect on her h4 status?
--- her status becomes AOS pending and H4 is gone
•If my wife loose her job during the use of her EAD what will be her status?
--- she will reamain AOS pending same as while using EAD
•I applied my I485 in July 2, 2007. As I already received my EAD, can I be unemployed after 180 days and start a business by myself?
---- you can be self-employed and have similar job description and LC
•I know after receiving the AP I visit any their country. What will be my status after I come back? Still H1b or anything else?
----- if you enter using H1 then it will be H1. the debate is still on whether using AP to enter causes you to lose H1 or not. It is possible to extend H1 status though.
It will be very much appreciated if some can answer my questions?
Thanks ahead\
dresses #8: Stronger With Each Tear
sangmami
07-12 09:37 AM
/12/2007: USCIS Reportedly Returning Visa Numbers to DOS
AILA has reported that when Rep. Lofgren issued a letter to Secretary Chertoff, she also disclosed that "It has also come to my attention that USCIS began returning visa numbers to the State Depaartment as early as Thrusday, July 5, 2007." It could be the answer to our question why they are holding July filing cases and why they stopped adjudicating 485 cases for which they pull out the numbers before July 2, 2007. What a mess
can any1 interpret wat this means
thanks
AILA has reported that when Rep. Lofgren issued a letter to Secretary Chertoff, she also disclosed that "It has also come to my attention that USCIS began returning visa numbers to the State Depaartment as early as Thrusday, July 5, 2007." It could be the answer to our question why they are holding July filing cases and why they stopped adjudicating 485 cases for which they pull out the numbers before July 2, 2007. What a mess
can any1 interpret wat this means
thanks
more...
makeup I Am - Mary J. Blige
Blog Feeds
07-13 12:48 PM
USCIS has recently published a new fact sheet of common questions and answers for members of the U.S. Armed Forces and their families. (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/Immigration%20Information%20for%20Members%20of%20t he%20U.S.%20Armed%20Forces%20and%20their%20Familie s.pdf) The fact sheet contains the most frequently asked questions that USCIS receives.
The fact sheet is worth reading if you are in the Armed Forces because the answers to some of the questions are different (and usually more advantageous) to members and/or dependents of those in the Armed Forces. For instance, if you are a civilian, obtained your green card through a marriage to a U.S. Citizen and you have been married for less than two years, you must file Form I-751, Petition to Remove Conditions on Residence (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=f858d59cb7a5d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1RCR D&vgnextchannel=db029c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD) to remove the conditional residence and obtain your permanent green card. You must file this form even if you intend on applying for citizenship a year later. (Persons who are married to U.S. citizens may apply for citizenship in three years.)
Members of the armed forces do not have to file Form I-751, Petition to Remove Conditions on Residence to remove conditional residence obtained through a marriage to a U.S. Citizen, if the foreign born spouse was inducted or enlisted in the military and is applying for naturalization based on qualifying military service. Thus, military personnel are permitted to "skip a step" and do not need to file form I-751.
Additional questions and answers and helpful email addresses to USCIS liaisons are included on the fact sheet.
http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/father%20and%20son.jpg
More... (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/2009/07/immigration_information_for_me_1.html)
The fact sheet is worth reading if you are in the Armed Forces because the answers to some of the questions are different (and usually more advantageous) to members and/or dependents of those in the Armed Forces. For instance, if you are a civilian, obtained your green card through a marriage to a U.S. Citizen and you have been married for less than two years, you must file Form I-751, Petition to Remove Conditions on Residence (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=f858d59cb7a5d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1RCR D&vgnextchannel=db029c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD) to remove the conditional residence and obtain your permanent green card. You must file this form even if you intend on applying for citizenship a year later. (Persons who are married to U.S. citizens may apply for citizenship in three years.)
Members of the armed forces do not have to file Form I-751, Petition to Remove Conditions on Residence to remove conditional residence obtained through a marriage to a U.S. Citizen, if the foreign born spouse was inducted or enlisted in the military and is applying for naturalization based on qualifying military service. Thus, military personnel are permitted to "skip a step" and do not need to file form I-751.
Additional questions and answers and helpful email addresses to USCIS liaisons are included on the fact sheet.
http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/father%20and%20son.jpg
More... (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/2009/07/immigration_information_for_me_1.html)
girlfriend Album: Stronger WithEach Tear
eastindia
05-07 02:55 PM
What do you mean by reputation?
Having a good website or a forum does not mean the lawyer is reputed. Even small lawyers can be good and can pay more attention to a case. Some lawyers do not know marketing and do not have good website, but they maybe good in law.
Having a good website or a forum does not mean the lawyer is reputed. Even small lawyers can be good and can pay more attention to a case. Some lawyers do not know marketing and do not have good website, but they maybe good in law.
hairstyles tattoo Mary J. Blige album
imm_pro
02-28 07:16 PM
DEC 07 PD is current ..??? which category are you in.
sundarpn
10-25 09:15 AM
I think it can be. When starting the employment based GC process, one of the question asked was ... has any family member ever applied for your immigration petition in the past. Just an educated guess... check with an attorney
lahiribaba
02-12 01:58 AM
why the hell you care? if you dont need it you can ask uscis to transfer it to my name ;)
